Third Week of Lent
- · Dan’s Deliberations, Discoveries, & Declarations
- · Today in Catholic History
- · Quote of the Day
- · Today’s Gospel Reading
- · Gospel Reflection
- · Reflection Prayer
- · Catholic Apologetics
- · A Franciscan’s Saint of the Day
- · Franciscan Formation Reflection
- · Reflection on part of the SFO Rule
We are in our third week of Lent; only 28 days till Easter Sunday. How are you doing with the Lenten requirements; prayer, fasting, sacrifices, and alms-giving? This Lenten season has been a special time for me. I feel a little closer to God more so this year than I have in the past. Praise be to God for opening my eyes a little wider and seeing all of you with me on my journey of faith.
† 638 – Death of Sophronius of Jerusalem, saint/patriarch of Jerusalem
† 859 – Death of Eulogius of Cordoba, Spanish Bishop and Christian Martyr
† 1513 – Giovanni de’ Medici is elected to the Papacy, and becomes Pope Leo X
† Feasts/Memorials: Saint Vindician, Blessed John Righi, Saint Alberta, Saint Aurea
(From the “On This Day” Blog Site
“Today in Catholic History”
Today’s reflection is about Jesus driving out the money changers from the Temple and poses to them a “mysterious” challenge: “destroy the temple and I raise it up again.”
(NAB John 2:13-25) 13 Since the Passover of the Jews was near,Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 He found in the temple area those who sold oxen, sheep, and doves, as well as the money-changers seated there. 15 He made a whip out of cords and drove them all out of the temple area, with the sheep and oxen, and spilled the coins of the money-changers and overturned their tables, 16 and to those who sold doves he said, “Take these out of here, and stop making my Father’s house a marketplace.” 17His disciples recalled the words of scripture, “Zeal for your house will consume me.” 18 At this the Jews answered and said to Him, “What sign can you show us for doing this?” 19 Jesus answered and said to them,“Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” 20 The Jews said, “This temple has been under construction for forty-six years, and you will raise it up in three days?” 21 But He was speaking about the temple of His body. 22 Therefore, when He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this, and they came to believe the scripture and the word Jesus had spoken. 23 While he was in Jerusalem for the feast of Passover, many began to believe in his name when they saw the signs he was doing. 24 But Jesus would not trust himself to them because he knew them all, 25 and did not need anyone to testify about human nature. He himself understood it well.
In today’s Gospel we learn about how Jesus overturned the “tables” of the “merchants” and the “money-changers” in the Temple at Jerusalem. In order to understand the relevance of Jesus’ action, we need to know a little bit about the activities that went on in and outside the Temple area. Worship at the Temple in Jerusalem included animal sacrifices as part of some of the rituals. So, merchants sold sacrificial animals to Jewish worshipers to be used in ritual sacrifices per Mosaic Law. The “money-changers” exchanged “pagan” Roman coins – – with its image of the Roman emperor, – – for the Temple coins needed to pay the Temple tax.
Jesus’ radical action at the Temple in Jerusalem is recorded in all four Gospels (a true rarity, happening in only 11 out of the 234** chronologic events found in the four Gospels). What happens in this Gospel reading is among the key events which will eventually lead to Jesus’ arrest, trial, Scourging, and Crucifixion. Unlike the other Gospels, John’s Gospel places this MAJOR event much earlier in Jesus’ public ministry, occurring at the very beginning of His ministry, just after His first miracle at the wedding feast at Cana (cf., John 2:1-12).
The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) place the cleansing of the Temple toward the last days of Jesus’ life (Matthew, on the day Jesus entered Jerusalem; Mark, on the next day). We need to remember that the “order” of events in the Gospel narratives is often determined more by “theological” motives than by “chronological” data. The Gospels were written with a specific audience in mind. For me, this is the WHY we should read each narrative story from all the Gospel books when provided. Here is a link to an excellent site which lists the scriptural readings from all four gospels about the same event, beginning with Jesus’ birth and 233 other events in chronological order:
We ALWAYS need to read the Gospel of John carefully, especially in Jesus’ relationship to the authorities of the Judaic culture of the day. John tends to suggest a greater tension and animosity between Jesus and the Jewish authorities (the Sadducees, Pharisees, and Scribes) than is shown in the Synoptic Gospels. In this regard, let us remember that John’s Gospel was the last of the four Gospels to be written (believed to be written in the 90’s A.D.); and its narrative reflects the growing divide between the Jewish and early Christian communities – – after the destruction of the Temple had already occurred in A.D. 70. Thus, a greater emphasis on the distinctions between Christianity and Judaism is found in John’s Gospel than in the Synoptic Gospels written much earlier. More often than the other Evangelists, John mingles “post-Resurrection” reflections of his Christian community in his Gospel narrative.
John is reflecting upon the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem (A.D. 70), recalling Jesus’ cleansing of the Temple and Jesus’ prophesy regarding its destruction. John uses this earlier story to interpret the later event of the Temple destruction and associated gruesome murders. John explains to his early Christian community Temple worship would no longer be necessary. Temple worship was surpassed through the events of Jesus’ Passion, Death, and Resurrection forty or so years PRIOR to the Temple’s destruction.
Does today’s event (destroying the Temple and rebuilding it in three days) indicate a foretelling of the post-resurrection replacement of the Temple by the person of Jesus Christ? I believe it certainly does!
Today’s story starts with Jesus and His disciples traveling to Jerusalem for “Passover”. The Temple in Jerusalem was understood and firmly believed by the Jewish people and nation as the dwelling place of God among His “chosen” people. All faithful and pious Jews were to make a pilgrimage to the Temple each year at the Passover time if at all possible. This particular event presented in today’s reading is the first of three “Passovers” mentioned in John’s Gospel (cf, John 6:4; 13:1). Taken literally, the number of documented “Passovers” Jesus participated in points to a public ministry of at least a minimum of two years or a maximum of no more than three years. We have always learned that Jesus’ public ministry lasted for three years. Here is the proof scripturally.
“If, however, the person cannot afford an animal of the flock, that person shall bring to the LORD as reparation for the wrong committed two turtledoves or two pigeons, one for a purification offering and the other for a burnt offering.” (Leviticus 5:7).
“When the days were completed for their purification according to the law of Moses, they took him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord, just as it is written in the law of the Lord, ‘Every male that opens the womb shall be consecrated to the Lord,’ and to offer the sacrifice of ‘a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons,’ in accordance with the dictate in the law of the Lord.” (Luke 2:22-24)
“The LORD also told Moses: When you take a census of the Israelites who are to be enrolled, each one, as he is enrolled, shall give the LORD a ransom for his life, so that no plague may come upon them for being enrolled. This is what everyone who is enrolled must pay: a half-shekel, according to the standard of the sanctuary shekel—twenty gerahs to the shekel—a half-shekel contribution to the LORD. Everyone who is enrolled, of twenty years or more, must give the contribution to the LORD. The rich need not give more, nor shall the poor give less, than a half-shekel in this contribution to the LORD to pay the ransom for their lives. When you receive this ransom money from the Israelites, you shall donate it to the service of the tent of meeting, that there it may be a reminder of the Israelites before the LORD of the ransom paid for their lives.” (Exodus 30:11–16).
An interesting note of trivia: before the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, every male Jew above nineteen years of age was obligated to make an annual contribution to its upkeep. After the Temple’s destruction in 70 A.D., the Roman occupiers forcibly imposed upon the Jewish nation an obligation of paying that same “tax” for the upkeep of the temple for “Jupiter Capitolinus” (AKA, Jupiter Optimus Maximus), the most important temple in Ancient Rome, located on the Capitoline Hill. (The picture above is of that Roman temple.)
In both John’s and Mark’s Gospel, Jesus referred to the “Temple” as His Father’s house being made into a “den of thieves” or a “marketplace”:
“Then he taught them saying, ‘Is it not written: “My house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples”? But you have made it a den of thieves.” (Mark 11:17);
“To those who sold doves he said, ‘Take these out of here, and stop making my Father’s house a marketplace.’” (John 2:16).
Jesus’ respect for His Father’s House and the Holy Scriptures of Moses’ inspired Jesus’ use of physical force to expel the “money-chargers”. The prophecy of Malachi foretold the coming of the Lord unexpectedly to His Temple in order to clean or refine it:
“The lord whom you seek will come suddenly to his temple; the messenger of the covenant whom you desire … He will purify the Levites, refining them like gold or silver, that they may bring offerings to the LORD in righteousness.” (Malachi 3:1, 3).
It’s clear that Jesus knew Himself to be “that Lord” prophesized by Malachi. His behavior is part of the living reality of the LIVING “Word”!
So, in today’s Gospel reading, the disciples saw with a grace to see with more clear eyes Jesus as the Messiah who burned with “zeal” for God’s house. The “blind” Jewish authorities, however, wanted proof that Jesus had divine authority to act as He did at the Temple. They demanded a “sign” from God to prove that Jesus was right in His actions. Otherwise, the “authorities” would treat Jesus as a fraud and a usurper of THEIR authority. Jesus replied that the “sign” God would give would be His resurrection (however, NO ONE could understand what he meant by saying):
“Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19).
What a powerful, yet misunderstood verse this is from today’s Gospel (And I believe in ALL of Holy Scripture!). Maybe it is because there are many verses about the destruction of the Temple occurring, in various forms, throughout the Bible. Here are a few examples of the Synoptic Gospel’s (and in ACTS as well) speaking of the same event:
“He [Jesus] said to them in reply, ‘You see all these things, do you not? Amen, I say to you, there will not be left here a stone upon another stone that will not be thrown down’; ‘You who would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days, save yourself, if you are the Son of God, [and] come down from the cross!” (Matthew 24:2; 27:40);
“Jesus said to him, ‘Do you see these great buildings? There will not be one stone left upon another that will not be thrown down’; those passing by reviled him, shaking their heads and saying, ‘Aha! You who would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days,save yourself by coming down from the cross.’” (Mark 13:2; 15:29);
“All that you see here—the days will come when there will not be left a stone upon another stone that will not be thrown down.” (Luke 21:6);
“We [Sanhedrin] have heard him [Stephen] claim that this Jesus the Nazorean will destroy this place and change the customs that Moses handed down to us.” (Acts 6:14).
“Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19);
“I will destroy this temple made with hands and within three days I will build another not made with hands” (Mark 14:58).
Today’s reading from John is symbolic of Jesus’ prophesy of His own resurrection and His resulting “NEW” community, His new “Living” Temple – – the Catholic (Universal) Church – –
“He [Jesus] was speaking about the temple of his body.” (see John 2:21).
“He will revive us after two days; on the third day he will raise us up, to live in his presence”(Hosea 6:2).
Regarding Jesus Christ, Hosea’s three days became a literal reality. So, as I say often, the “Old” lives in the “NEW” Hosea’s prophesy.
From today’s reading, you learned that it took forty-six years to build the Temple in Jerusalem. Here is a little history lesson.
“Forty-six years” (John 2:20), based on references found in the books of a first-century Jewish historian, “Flavius Josephus” (cf., Jewish Wars 1, 21, 1 #401; Antiquities 15, 11, 1 #380) AND Holy Scripture, places the possible date of today’s reading happening during the spring “Passover” of the year “28 A.D.”.
“In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of Abilene …” (Luke 3:1).
Tiberius succeeded Augustus as Roman emperor in A.D. 14 and reigned until A.D. 37. The fifteenth year of his reign would have fallen between A.D. 27 and 29. Pontius Pilate was the Prefect (a kind of mayor) of Judea from A.D. 26 to 36. Herod, a Tetrarch (Governor), ruled over Galilee and Perea from 4 B.C. to A.D. 39. Philip was Tetrarch of the territory to the north and east of the Sea of Galilee from 4 B.C. to A.D. 34. Nothing is known about “Lysanias” who is said here to have been Tetrarch of Abilene, a territory northwest of Damascus (Syria). All these dates from Holy Scripture fall into an accepted range of A.D. 27 – 29. Per the data in Holy Scripture, Flavius Josephus is probably correct concerning the year “28” as the year of this awesome event. (I LOVE math, as you can see!!)
Let me ask you a question: Can I use the anger of Jesus showed in today’s reading in order to justify my own episodes of anger? I guess it depends, doesn’t it? We need to remember that “anger” is one of the “Capital” sins. However, we have to remember that it was a COMPASSIONATE Jesus who took a whip to clear the Temple of the “money-changers” and the animals present there for sale:
“To those who sold doves he said, ‘Take these out of here, and stop making my Father’s house a marketplace.’” (John 2:16).
During His public ministry Jesus is oft-times criticized, slandered, and denounced. He is eventually betrayed by one close to Him, resulting in His being arrested and scourged prior to His death sentence. Even through all this horribly brutal treatment, Jesus never responded with any type of anger when the attacks were directed against Him personally. So, why did He “go postal” at the Temple in today’s reading? I believe it is because His “Father’s house of prayer” – – His Father’s HOME – – was desecrated by business affairs and money, and not for proper worship. (You can “diss” me, but don’t ever “diss” my mom or dad!) Also, animal sacrifices were to be no longer needed in the NEW Temple: Jesus Christ!!
Does Jesus’ anger, clearly displayed in today’s Gospel, justify my own angry moments, whether petty such as when a driver cuts in front of me, or serious such as when someone misrepresents or slanders me? In reality, I probably think not! Food for thought: when anger is self-righteous and self-serving, it is never justified.
In summary, after clearing the Temple of the “merchants” and the “money-changers”, John’s Gospel tells us that the people asked for a sign of Jesus’ authority for doing such a risky and presumptuous act as disrupting the “normal” course of business in the Temple. In response to the Temple leader’s indictment, Jesus foretold His own death and Resurrection when He said:
“Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19).
Throughout John’s Gospel, the language of miraculous “signs” is distinctive. The people of Jesus’ time, and still today, look to these “signs” for proof of His authority. In today’s reading, we learn that the “sign” of the highest quality – – and above ALL others – – will be Jesus Himself, and the events of His betrayal, Passion, Crucifixion, death on the Cross, – – and His Resurrection – – ALL of these signs – – for our sake!!
Think about places and times when you have experienced God’s presence personally and intimately. After His Resurrection, Jesus’ disciples finally received the grace to understand that Jesus was present with them as they gathered to pray and share a meal. Jesus teaches us in today’s Gospel that He is “God’s presence with us”!! Thank you my Lord God for Jesus’ presence with us, especially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist.
During this Lenten season, reflect upon the meaning of this “sign” (His death and Resurrection) for You and Your world. Take this opportunity to consider the quality of your prayer and worship. Remember that in prayer, we seek to deepen our relationship with the “person” of Christ, Jesus Himself. In worship “with the community”, we gather to experience anew the “Passion”, death, and Resurrection of Jesus AND its significance in our lives! Jesus Christ promises to be present with us whenever we gather for prayer, even if we are not physically with each other, such as in the “Divine Office” prayer. NOW, that’s a miracle!!
I feel today’s Gospel invites us to reflect upon OUR worship of God. The Temple was an important and holy place for Jesus and His Jewish contemporaries; a place where they gathered to worship God together. Our Catholic – Christian understanding of “worship” was transformed – – made fuller – – in light of Jesus’ “Resurrection” on that special Easter morning in Israel. In the Catholic – Christian understanding, God is worshiped in the “person of Jesus Christ”. As we read in today’s Gospel, Jesus Himself “IS” the “Temple” destroyed AND raised up again in three days!! (Alleluia, Alleluia, Alleluia!!)
“Saint Francis’ Vocation Prayer”
“Most High, Glorious God,
enlighten the darkness of our minds.
Give us a right faith, a firm hope
and a perfect charity,
so that we may always and in all things
act according to Your Holy Will. Amen.”
My reason and purpose for this section on my blog is to provide “scriptural confirmation” for our beliefs and doctrines, not to cause dissention or opposition with my fellow believers in Jesus Christ, yet not in union with the Roman Catholic Church. Whether God speaks to us through the “Bible”, or through “Tradition”, it is the Holy Spirit that inspires the “Word” from which all authentic tradition flows.
Tradition can be separated into two aspects: oral and behavioral. Oral tradition includes written forms. After all, it ALL started with oral tradition. Behavioral tradition includes Baptism, Eucharist or Lord’s Supper, Lying on of hands or healing, Intercessory prayer, and Ordination.
All Scriptural verses are taken from both the Revised Standard Version: Catholic Edition of the Holy Bible and the King James Version of the Holy Bible.
Real Presence in the Eucharist
“’For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, ‘This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.’ In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant of my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.’ For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes” (1 Corinthians 11:23-26). RSV
“For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come.” (1 Corinthians 11:23-26). KJV
“Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 11:27). RSV
”Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 11:27). KJV
Constantine was king of Cornwall. Unreliable tradition has him married to the daughter of the king of Brittany who on her death ceded his throne to his son and became a monk at St. Mochuda monastery at Rahan, Ireland. He performed menial tasks at the monastery, then studied for the priesthood and was ordained. He went as a missionary to Scotland under St. Columba and then St. Kentigern, preached in Galloway, and became Abbot of a monastery at Govan. In old age, on his way to Kintyre, he was attacked by pirates who cut off his right arm, and he bled to death. He is regarded as Scotland’s first martyr. His feast day is March 11th.
11. Trusting the Father, Christ chose for Himself and His mother a poor and humble life, even though He valued created things attentively and lovingly. Let the Secular Franciscans seek a proper spirit of detachment from temporal goods by simplifying their own material needs. Let them be mindful that according to the gospel they are stewards of the goods received for the benefit of God’s children.
Thus, in the spirit of the Beatitudes, and as pilgrims and strangers on their way to the home of the Father, they should strive to purify their hearts from every tendency and yearning for possession and power.
12. Witnessing to the good yet to come and obligated to acquire purity of heart because of the vocation they have embraced, they should set themselves free to love God and their brothers and sisters.